Even the best Battlefield game ever might not matter much if people are more in the mood for an open-world Western or a battle royale. As I mentioned in an earlier reply, BFV launched into a very competitive game landscape where it had to go against some exceptional titles across genres, and where its style of FPS gameplay wasn't in vogue. If men were really, truly roiled up by the marketing, BFV wouldn't even be vaguely competitive with those top two.Īnd second. It's not an abysmal failure (unless sales tanked in December), it's just not selling as well as the expected heavyweights. In both cases, it's because everyday people have a wildly different set of priorities, and arguably a healthier set of priorities.įirst, let's look at NPD data for November: BFV was the third best-selling game next to RDR2 and Black Ops 4. I'm reminded of what I see on tech forums, where hardcore Android fans have insisted for years that the iPhone is destined to fail because it doesn't have a microSD slot (or a removable battery, or.) and wonder why it sells so well. EA might not have helped matters by being heavy-handed, but I don't think that's the main factor behind the current performance. They're more likely to skip BFV because they didn't have the budget to get both that and their annual Call of Duty purchase. ![]() They don't pay attention to E3, and they certainly don't come here. ![]() There are many people who buy only a handful of games per year and are completely oblivious to the scene outside of ads and maybe reading a review if they're unsure about a game. There's a tendency on gaming forums to act as if their tiny subsection of hardcore fans represents all gamers everywhere, and it doesn't. The problem is that you're assuming the majority of the potential audience actually cares about (or even saw) a lot of that.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |